Certificate signature algorithm
The algorithm the certificate is signed with. Current certificates use SHA-256; browsers refuse anything older.
The issuer signs every certificate, and the signature algorithm says how: which hash function and which key type. Typical values are sha256WithRSAEncryption for RSA certificates and ecdsa-with-SHA256 or ecdsa-with-SHA384 for ECDSA ones. The report prints the name exactly as it appears in the certificate.
Why it matters. The signature is what prevents anyone from forging a certificate for your domain. MD5 and SHA-1 fell to practical collision attacks, public authorities stopped issuing SHA-1 certificates in 2016, and browsers reject them. SHA-256 or stronger is the norm.
How SiteScan shows it
The row is informational: it appears whenever a certificate was read and is marked as fine, because a certificate with a rejected algorithm would not have passed the scan's verified connection in the first place. RSA versus ECDSA is a choice, not a grade. ECDSA keys are smaller and make the handshake a little cheaper, RSA is the most compatible, and many servers serve both.
When to act
For a public certificate the authority picks the hash; you choose the key type when you create the request, for example --key-type ecdsa in Certbot. If an internal or self-signed certificate still uses SHA-1, reissue it with openssl req -new -sha256. More on the whole group: certificate expiry.
See this check on your own site
Run a free scan: the report shows this row for your domain along with the other checks of the site audit.
More in “TLS certificate”
What SiteScan checks
TLS certificate
- TLS certificate expiry
- Outdated TLS versions (TLS 1.0/1.1)
- TLS certificate chain
- TLS certificate issuer
- Certificate signature algorithm
Domain registration
- Domain registration expiry
- Registered domain name
- Domain registrar
- Domain registration date
- Domain last updated date
- Domain status codes (EPP)
- Domain transfer lock
- Registrar abuse contact
- RDAP and WHOIS data source
Indexing
- robots.txt file
- CSS and JS blocked in robots.txt
- XML sitemap
- Sitemap index file
- Off-domain URLs in the sitemap
- Sitemap lastmod dates
- Broken URLs in the sitemap
- RSS and Atom feed
Addresses & redirects
Security headers
- HTTP security headers and grade
- Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header
- Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header
- X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
- X-Frame-Options and clickjacking
- Referrer-Policy header
- Permissions-Policy header
- HSTS preload list
- CORS and cross-origin reads
- HTTP TRACE method
Delivery & reputation
- Cache-Control header for HTML
- ETag and Last-Modified revalidation
- HTTP/3 and QUIC support
- Server version disclosure in headers
- DNS blocklist (DNSBL) check
Internal links
Exposure
- Exposed sensitive files (.env, .git, backups)
- Directory listing enabled
- Public JavaScript source maps
- Exposed WordPress endpoints
Well-known files
- security.txt file
- llms.txt for AI assistants
- llms-full.txt file
- ads.txt authorized sellers file
- humans.txt file
- Well-known change-password URL
DNS & email
- MX records (mail servers)
- SPF record
- DMARC record and policy
- DNSSEC signing
- CAA record
- Nameserver redundancy
- IPv6 support (AAAA record)
- MTA-STS policy
- TLS-RPT reporting record
- BIMI record (brand logo in email)
- Wildcard DNS record
- Dangling CNAME and subdomain takeover
Privacy & consent
- Analytics and tracking scripts
- Cookie consent banner
- Privacy policy link
- Terms of service link
- Imprint (Impressum)
- Accessibility statement
Core Web Vitals
- Lighthouse performance score
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- CrUX field data vs lab data