Scan report for sirius.by
4 pages crawled — 1180 words, 31 images and 145 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 57 distinct problems found, counted 148 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 73/100 · Issues: 34
- Accessibility
- 57/100 · Issues: 25
- Performance
- 85/100 · Issues: 9
- Security
- 0/100 · Issues: 44
- Privacy
- 85/100 · Issues: 6
- HTML validity
- 95/100 · Issues: 5
- Forms
- 90/100 · Issues: 13
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 4
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 94/100 · Issues: 6
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — Strict-Transport-Security asks for preload without the year of max-age and includeSubDomains the list requires.
- Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/5.6.40.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 4 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2324x1200-uptime-volvo-truck-drivingпппп.jpg (1668 KB), /wp-content/uploads/2021/04/135047863.jpg (895 KB), /wp-content/uploads/2019/03/333.jpg (1036 KB), /wp-content/uploads/2017/03/pen-and-paper-min.png (2015 KB).
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
- Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by bot protection rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.