Scan report for polimerprofil.by
5 pages crawled — 6498 words, 180 images and 634 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 35 distinct problems found, counted 113 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-30
Category scores
- Overall
- 84/100
- SEO
- 60/100 · Issues: 13
- Accessibility
- 82/100 · Issues: 16
- Performance
- 88/100 · Issues: 12
- Security
- 49/100 · Issues: 29
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 87/100 · Issues: 11
- Forms
- 80/100 · Issues: 14
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 79/100 · Issues: 15
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Stop robots.txt from disallowing the whole site — Search engines are allowed to read the site at all.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
- Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Give every img element a real source — The pictures appear without waiting on a script that may never run.
What the site checks found
- Critical — SEO — robots.txt disallows crawling of the home page — search engines are shut out of the site.
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.