Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for daniosvet.ru

5 pages crawled — 3388 words, 73 images and 546 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 34 distinct problems found, counted 101 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-30

Category scores

Overall
88/100
SEO
86/100 · Issues: 13
Accessibility
86/100 · Issues: 17
Performance
80/100 · Issues: 12
Security
49/100 · Issues: 35
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
100/100 · No issues found
Forms
55/100 · Issues: 20
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
98/100 · Issues: 1
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Submit the password form over POST — The password stops appearing in URLs, server logs and browser history.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — Strict-Transport-Security is set but its max-age is under six months.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.