Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for history.by

5 pages crawled — 5342 words, 133 images and 1364 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 48 distinct problems found, counted 151 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
82/100
SEO
35/100 · Issues: 36
Accessibility
68/100 · Issues: 27
Performance
93/100 · Issues: 7
Security
15/100 · Issues: 45
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
94/100 · Issues: 10
Mobile
88/100 · Issues: 10
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Make each language version its own canonical — Each language version stays in the index for its own language.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
  • Medium — SEO — 6 hreflang links are not confirmed by a link back from the other language: / → /be/ (be), / → /en/ (en), /en/konf-2002/ → /konf-2002/ (ru). Google ignores one-way pairs.
  • Low — SEO — 5 alternates are in a different language from the hreflang code they are listed under: / → /be/ (be), /en/konf-2002/ → /konf-2002/ (ru), /en/konf-2002/ → /be/konf-2002/ (be).
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.