Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for ramer.by

5 pages crawled — 4327 words, 264 images and 781 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 52 distinct problems found, counted 173 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
82/100
SEO
75/100 · Issues: 29
Accessibility
63/100 · Issues: 32
Performance
58/100 · Issues: 24
Security
49/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
94/100 · Issues: 10
HTML validity
87/100 · Issues: 11
Forms
79/100 · Issues: 15
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
82/100 · Issues: 10
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
99/100 · Issues: 2
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 15 of 15 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Medium — Performance — 9 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.