Scan report for avtostream.by
1 pages crawled — 952 words, 6 images and 35 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 26 distinct problems found, counted 26 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-29
Category scores
- Overall
- 89/100
- SEO
- 61/100 · Issues: 9
- Accessibility
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- Performance
- 79/100 · Issues: 3
- Security
- 55/100 · Issues: 9
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Name the sitemap in robots.txt — Every crawler finds the sitemap without having to guess its path.
- Cache static files for a year — Returning visitors load scripts, styles and images from cache instead of the network.
- Publish an SPF record — Receiving servers can tell your mail from mail that only claims to be yours.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — SEO — avtostream.by redirects with a temporary HTTP 307 instead of a 301.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 2 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 3 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.unsplash.com%2Fphoto-1503736334956-4c8f8e92946d&w=3840&q=75 (571 KB), /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.unsplash.com%2Fphoto-1522075469751-3a6694fb2f61&w=3840&q=75 (1100 KB), /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.unsplash.com%2Fphoto-1523580846011-d3a5bc25702b&w=3840&q=75 (566 KB).
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.