Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for indigo.com.by

5 pages crawled — 1098 words, 83 images and 77 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 50 distinct problems found, counted 155 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
83/100
SEO
74/100 · Issues: 32
Accessibility
65/100 · Issues: 21
Performance
64/100 · Issues: 24
Security
34/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
92/100 · Issues: 11
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 1
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
88/100 · Issues: 10
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Set width=device-width in the viewport meta tag — Phones lay the page out at their own width instead of shrinking a desktop one.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 16 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Medium — Performance — 9 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.