Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for gwminsk.com

5 pages crawled — 6166 words, 33 images and 183 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 31 distinct problems found, counted 65 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
88/100
SEO
91/100 · Issues: 7
Accessibility
95/100 · Issues: 3
Performance
84/100 · Issues: 4
Security
48/100 · Issues: 32
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
95/100 · Issues: 3
Forms
89/100 · Issues: 8
Links
82/100 · Issues: 1
Console
96/100 · Issues: 2
Infrastructure
82/100 · Issues: 4
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
91/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 6 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Medium — Images — Images that do not load: 2 of 8 checked — the pages show a broken picture where they were.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The icon the pages declare answers HTTP 403, so tabs and bookmarks fall back to a blank page symbol.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
  • High — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 10 of 10 checked.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.