Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for wipin.by

1 pages crawled — 99 words, 11 images and 32 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 37 distinct problems found, counted 37 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-30

Category scores

Overall
85/100
SEO
73/100 · Issues: 5
Accessibility
64/100 · Issues: 6
Performance
76/100 · Issues: 6
Security
28/100 · Issues: 13
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
94/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
97/100 · Issues: 1
Links
97/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
97/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.
  • Cache static files for a year — Returning visitors load scripts, styles and images from cache instead of the network.

What the site checks found

  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 9 of 9 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.