Scan report for vekamaf.by
4 pages crawled — 1949 words, 293 images and 420 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 49 distinct problems found, counted 116 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-29
Category scores
- Overall
- 80/100
- SEO
- 77/100 · Issues: 15
- Accessibility
- 60/100 · Issues: 26
- Performance
- 81/100 · Issues: 11
- Security
- 12/100 · Issues: 27
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 83/100 · Issues: 11
- Forms
- 97/100 · Issues: 4
- Links
- 87/100 · Issues: 3
- Console
- 89/100 · Issues: 5
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 5
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 4
- Images
- 98/100 · Issues: 3
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Add a favicon — The site gets its own icon in tabs, bookmarks and history.
- Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
- Add an x-default hreflang entry — Visitors none of the languages match land on a defined page instead of a guess.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — Sitemap URLs pointing at a different domain: 30 — they will be ignored.
- Medium — SEO — 1 hreflang links are not confirmed by a link back from the other language: /processnye-prilozenia/ → /spracovanie-ziadosti/ (sk). Google ignores one-way pairs.
- Critical — Security — Files a deploy should never publish are readable over the web: /.git/config, /.git/HEAD.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Medium — Performance — 10 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 2 of 10 checked.
- Low — Links — Internal links that reach their page through a redirect: 3 of 10 checked.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.