Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for usp.by

5 pages crawled — 838 words, 10 images and 110 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 27 distinct problems found, counted 70 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
62/100 · Issues: 18
Accessibility
83/100 · Issues: 10
Performance
88/100 · Issues: 2
Security
43/100 · Issues: 30
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
100/100 · No issues found
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 5
Mobile
97/100 · Issues: 5
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Send the charset in the Content-Type header — The browser knows the encoding before it reads the first byte, instead of guessing at it.
  • Shorten the over-long titles — The whole title stays visible in search results.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.usp.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 8 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.