Scan report for besterhof.by
1 pages crawled — 7 words, 0 images and 0 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 30 distinct problems found, counted 30 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 86/100
- SEO
- 28/100 · Issues: 12
- Accessibility
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Performance
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- Security
- 52/100 · Issues: 10
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.besterhof.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
- Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by Cloudflare rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.