Scan report for sapieha.org
5 pages crawled — 13742 words, 12 images and 146 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 23 distinct problems found, counted 49 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-29
Category scores
- Overall
- 91/100
- SEO
- 64/100 · Issues: 24
- Accessibility
- 95/100 · Issues: 6
- Performance
- 82/100 · Issues: 2
- Security
- 64/100 · Issues: 10
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Point the canonical link at this page — The page keeps its own ranking signals instead of handing them to another address.
- Expand the very short meta descriptions — A fuller snippet gives searchers a reason to click.
- Introduce a Content-Security-Policy — Injected scripts stop being able to run.
- Add an apple-touch-icon and a web app manifest — A site saved to a phone home screen gets its own icon.
- Add a skip link to the main content — Keyboard users reach the content without tabbing through the whole menu.
- Cache static files for a year — Returning visitors load scripts, styles and images from cache instead of the network.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — Sitemap URLs pointing at a different domain: 24 — they will be ignored.
- Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.sapieha.org and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Low — SEO — Internal links that differ from the address the server serves only by a trailing slash, and are redirected on every visit: 10.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 9 of 9 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 5 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /images/img_0352.jpg (688 KB), /images/img_0355.jpg (861 KB), /images/telegraph20memorial20notice.jpg (785 KB), /images/polish20announcement.jpg (669 KB), /images/img_0354.jpg (1082 KB).
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.