Scan report for pirozhenka.by
5 pages crawled — 2578 words, 22 images and 149 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 28 distinct problems found, counted 59 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-29
Category scores
- Overall
- 88/100
- SEO
- 75/100 · Issues: 15
- Accessibility
- 94/100 · Issues: 10
- Performance
- 70/100 · Issues: 4
- Security
- 58/100 · Issues: 12
- Privacy
- 100/100 · No issues found
- HTML validity
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Forms
- 85/100 · Issues: 7
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- Not measured
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 6
- Mobile
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Submit the password form over POST — The password stops appearing in URLs, server logs and browser history.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Add integrity hashes to the CDN scripts and stylesheets — A compromised CDN can no longer run whatever it likes on the site.
- Give every link readable text — Screen-reader users hear where a link goes instead of "link".
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Compress scripts and stylesheets — Scripts and stylesheets transfer at a fraction of their size.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Security — The Content-Security-Policy allows 'unsafe-inline' for styles — script injection is still blocked, but injected CSS can repaint the page and leak what is on it.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.24.0 (Ubuntu).
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Medium — Performance — 4 of 12 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 4 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Performance — 5 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /assets/advantage-icon-natural.png (679 KB), /assets/advantage-icon-chef.png (683 KB), /assets/site-photo-02-advantages-cake.png (1186 KB), /assets/advantage-icon-custom.png (744 KB), /assets/advantage-icon-delivery.png (674 KB).
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.