Scan report for mastico.by
5 pages crawled — 1450 words, 63 images and 155 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 32 distinct problems found, counted 72 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-03
Category scores
- Overall
- 90/100
- SEO
- 81/100 · Issues: 19
- Accessibility
- 98/100 · Issues: 2
- Performance
- 89/100 · Issues: 14
- Security
- 31/100 · Issues: 32
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.
- Introduce a Content-Security-Policy — Injected scripts stop being able to run.
What the site checks found
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Security — Strict-Transport-Security asks for preload without the year of max-age and includeSubDomains the list requires.
- Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /wp-content/uploads/2026/11/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
- Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by bot protection rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.