Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for burlingtonbathrooms.ru

5 pages crawled — 6078 words, 135 images and 1197 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 53 distinct problems found, counted 179 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-03

Category scores

Overall
84/100
SEO
79/100 · Issues: 31
Accessibility
62/100 · Issues: 32
Performance
76/100 · Issues: 32
Security
24/100 · Issues: 51
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 5
HTML validity
98/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
91/100 · Issues: 5
Links
99/100 · Issues: 1
Console
95/100 · Issues: 3
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
84/100 · Issues: 13
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 5 of 5 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1, x-powered-by: PHP/5.6.40.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.