Scan report for dipmarket.by
5 pages crawled — 6510 words, 142 images and 292 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 46 distinct problems found, counted 116 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-02
Category scores
- Overall
- 85/100
- SEO
- 52/100 · Issues: 20
- Accessibility
- 69/100 · Issues: 22
- Performance
- 63/100 · Issues: 25
- Security
- 67/100 · Issues: 19
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- HTML validity
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Forms
- 80/100 · Issues: 12
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 93/100 · Issues: 7
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send a Permissions-Policy header — Camera, microphone and geolocation stay switched off for embedded content.
- Add rel="noopener" to target="_blank" links — External tabs can no longer reach back into the opener window.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.dipmarket.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — 3 hreflang alternates redirect or do not answer: / → /ru/ (ru), /novosti/novinka-ot-carolina-herrera-2/ → /ru/novosti/novinka-ot-carolina-herrera-2/ (ru), /o-kompanii/obrascheniya-gragdan/lichnye-obrashheniya/ → /ru/o-kompanii/obrascheniya-gragdan/lichnye-obrashheniya/ (ru).
- Low — SEO — 3 alternates are in a different language from the hreflang code they are listed under: / → /by/ (by), /novosti/novinka-ot-carolina-herrera-2/ → /by/novosti/novinka-ot-carolina-herrera-2/ (by), /o-kompanii/obrascheniya-gragdan/lichnye-obrashheniya/ → /by/o-kompanii/obrascheniya-gragdan/lichnye-obrashheniya/ (by).
- Medium — SEO — 3 hreflang alternates name a different canonical, so the listed version is not the one in the index: / → /by/ (by), /novosti/novinka-ot-carolina-herrera-2/ → /by/novosti/novinka-ot-carolina-herrera-2/ (by), /o-kompanii/obrascheniya-gragdan/lichnye-obrashheniya/ → /by/o-kompanii/obrascheniya-gragdan/lichnye-obrashheniya/ (by).
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 2 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.