Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for cleverfox.by

2 pages crawled — 5225 words, 7 images and 125 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 53 distinct problems found, counted 62 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
80/100
SEO
45/100 · Issues: 11
Accessibility
63/100 · Issues: 10
Performance
90/100 · Issues: 6
Security
22/100 · Issues: 18
Privacy
87/100 · Issues: 3
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 1
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
96/100 · Issues: 1
Infrastructure
78/100 · Issues: 6
Mobile
84/100 · Issues: 5
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Redirect http:// to https:// — Visitors and crawlers land on the encrypted address every time.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — 1 canonical addresses named by crawled pages are not listed in the sitemap: /cleverfox.by.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.cleverfox.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • High — SEO — 1 canonical links point at an address that does not answer: /cleverfox.by (404).
  • Medium — Security — The TLS certificate expires in 29 days.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.