Scan report for chistogoliki.by
2 pages crawled — 2158 words, 14 images and 60 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 37 distinct problems found, counted 60 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-27
Category scores
- Overall
- 82/100
- SEO
- 42/100 · Issues: 14
- Accessibility
- 64/100 · Issues: 12
- Performance
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Security
- 19/100 · Issues: 22
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 97/100 · Issues: 2
- Forms
- 94/100 · Issues: 4
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- Not measured
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 2
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Point the canonical link at this page — The page keeps its own ranking signals instead of handing them to another address.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.chistogoliki.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — 1 hreflang links are not confirmed by a link back from the other language: / → /clients/ (ru). Google ignores one-way pairs.
- Medium — SEO — 1 hreflang alternates name a different canonical, so the listed version is not the one in the index: / → /clients/ (ru).
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.