Scan report for bestfish.by
5 pages crawled — 8260 words, 260 images and 2515 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 52 distinct problems found, counted 171 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-30
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 59/100 · Issues: 32
- Accessibility
- 58/100 · Issues: 30
- Performance
- 75/100 · Issues: 19
- Security
- 22/100 · Issues: 49
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 89/100 · Issues: 10
- Forms
- 95/100 · Issues: 7
- Links
- 91/100 · Issues: 11
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Point the canonical link at this page — The page keeps its own ranking signals instead of handing them to another address.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 8 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Links — Internal links that reach their page through a redirect: 10 of 10 checked.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Meta Pixel with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by BitNinja rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.