Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for arenda-proektora.by

2 pages crawled — 1742 words, 98 images and 18 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 47 distinct problems found, counted 85 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-02

Category scores

Overall
77/100
SEO
30/100 · Issues: 22
Accessibility
64/100 · Issues: 11
Performance
82/100 · Issues: 11
Security
31/100 · Issues: 18
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 4
HTML validity
97/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
51/100 · Issues: 11
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
88/100 · Issues: 4
Images
97/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 1 of 2 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.arenda-proektora.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.