Scan report for znwr.ru
5 pages crawled — 3815 words, 916 images and 1662 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 48 distinct problems found, counted 119 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-02
Category scores
- Overall
- 88/100
- SEO
- 78/100 · Issues: 31
- Accessibility
- 68/100 · Issues: 24
- Performance
- 78/100 · Issues: 14
- Security
- 58/100 · Issues: 34
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 96/100 · Issues: 3
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 95/100 · Issues: 6
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Add a twitter:card meta tag — Links shared on X get a preview card instead of a bare URL.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 8 of 11 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu).
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 1 of 10 checked.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica, Meta Pixel with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.