Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for zegt.by

1 pages crawled — 1379 words, 36 images and 71 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 42 distinct problems found, counted 42 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
80/100
SEO
58/100 · Issues: 8
Accessibility
58/100 · Issues: 6
Performance
70/100 · Issues: 6
Security
22/100 · Issues: 13
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
88/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
88/100 · Issues: 2
Images
97/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Redirect http:// to https:// — Visitors and crawlers land on the encrypted address every time.
  • Show a visible focus indicator — Keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Compress scripts and stylesheets — Scripts and stylesheets transfer at a fraction of their size.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 16 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Medium — Performance — 9 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.