Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for zcm.by

5 pages crawled — 2043 words, 125 images and 300 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 56 distinct problems found, counted 151 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
81/100
SEO
81/100 · Issues: 18
Accessibility
57/100 · Issues: 32
Performance
79/100 · Issues: 17
Security
4/100 · Issues: 47
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
88/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 2
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
91/100 · Issues: 5
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
93/100 · Issues: 7
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.

What the site checks found

  • Medium — SEO — Stylesheets and scripts the pages load that robots.txt disallows: 5 of 62 — Googlebot renders the site without them.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.4.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 8 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.