Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for yellowslon.by

5 pages crawled — 6410 words, 13 images and 83 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 47 distinct problems found, counted 139 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
82/100
SEO
48/100 · Issues: 43
Accessibility
75/100 · Issues: 15
Performance
80/100 · Issues: 15
Security
37/100 · Issues: 41
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
80/100 · Issues: 8
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
89/100 · Issues: 6
Infrastructure
79/100 · Issues: 2
Mobile
98/100 · Issues: 4
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Medium — SEO — 5 hreflang alternates redirect or do not answer: / → /enhttps://yellowslon.by/ (en), / → /behttps://yellowslon.by/ (be), /en → /enhttps://yellowslon.by (en).
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.26.3.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of 11 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • High — Infrastructure — The domain registration expires in 4 days.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.