Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for yarko.info

5 pages crawled — 1257 words, 104 images and 330 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 75 distinct problems found, counted 241 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-01

Category scores

Overall
69/100
SEO
56/100 · Issues: 35
Accessibility
15/100 · Issues: 59
Performance
70/100 · Issues: 28
Security
0/100 · Issues: 50
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
88/100 · Issues: 20
Forms
25/100 · Issues: 17
Links
96/100 · Issues: 6
Console
96/100 · Issues: 2
Infrastructure
94/100 · Issues: 6
Mobile
83/100 · Issues: 16
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Replace the legacy doctype with <!DOCTYPE html> — The page renders in standards mode in every browser.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.yarko.info and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of 14 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The icon the pages declare answers HTTP 404, so tabs and bookmarks fall back to a blank page symbol.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.