Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for xirixweb.github.io

5 pages crawled — 1779 words, 66 images and 127 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 51 distinct problems found, counted 132 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
85/100
SEO
58/100 · Issues: 38
Accessibility
61/100 · Issues: 26
Performance
74/100 · Issues: 12
Security
58/100 · Issues: 34
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
98/100 · Issues: 3
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
96/100 · Issues: 2
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
92/100 · Issues: 10
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 1 of 5 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Low — Security — The home page is served with Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * — scripts on any other site can read it.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /assets/images/1.png (4098 KB).
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.