Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for woodoil.by

5 pages crawled — 6304 words, 1789 images and 3250 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 50 distinct problems found, counted 174 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-01

Category scores

Overall
85/100
SEO
86/100 · Issues: 22
Accessibility
57/100 · Issues: 31
Performance
63/100 · Issues: 40
Security
55/100 · Issues: 35
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
94/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
96/100 · Issues: 6
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
78/100 · Issues: 12
Infrastructure
94/100 · Issues: 10
Mobile
99/100 · Issues: 2
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 14 of 14 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.