Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for wipes.by

5 pages crawled — 443 words, 24 images and 59 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 28 distinct problems found, counted 87 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
74/100 · Issues: 25
Accessibility
98/100 · Issues: 2
Performance
73/100 · Issues: 9
Security
34/100 · Issues: 44
Privacy
91/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
93/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 6 of 6 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Medium — Performance — 3 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.