Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for webcom-belarus.by

1 pages crawled — 1475 words, 5 images and 52 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 36 distinct problems found, counted 36 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
83/100
SEO
58/100 · Issues: 8
Accessibility
76/100 · Issues: 6
Performance
94/100 · Issues: 2
Security
1/100 · Issues: 16
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
91/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 1
Console
Not measured
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Make og:image an absolute URL — The preview image is actually fetched when the link is shared.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.webcom-belarus.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu).
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Tag Manager with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.