Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for vonadi.com

5 pages crawled — 1177 words, 110 images and 147 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 36 distinct problems found, counted 92 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
91/100
SEO
92/100 · Issues: 14
Accessibility
74/100 · Issues: 16
Performance
84/100 · Issues: 18
Security
48/100 · Issues: 32
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 2
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
98/100 · Issues: 3
Images
98/100 · Issues: 4

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
  • Send a Permissions-Policy header — Camera, microphone and geolocation stay switched off for embedded content.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
  • Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.