Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for vitrans.by

4 pages crawled — 648 words, 67 images and 15 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 54 distinct problems found, counted 87 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-02

Category scores

Overall
86/100
SEO
64/100 · Issues: 24
Accessibility
82/100 · Issues: 8
Performance
83/100 · Issues: 6
Security
45/100 · Issues: 29
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
95/100 · Issues: 3
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 1
Links
95/100 · Issues: 2
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
98/100 · Issues: 3
Mobile
88/100 · Issues: 8
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Give every page a <title> — The page gets a real headline in results and browser tabs.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 1 of 3 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /images/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Links — Internal links that reach their page through a redirect: 1 of 1 checked.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.