Scan report for viapol.by
5 pages crawled — 486 words, 9 images and 91 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 52 distinct problems found, counted 136 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-30
Category scores
- Overall
- 84/100
- SEO
- 37/100 · Issues: 47
- Accessibility
- 69/100 · Issues: 14
- Performance
- 92/100 · Issues: 6
- Security
- 56/100 · Issues: 31
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 87/100 · Issues: 11
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 93/100 · Issues: 4
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 95/100 · Issues: 9
- Mobile
- 85/100 · Issues: 13
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Give every page a <title> — The page gets a real headline in results and browser tabs.
- Add the <!DOCTYPE html> declaration — Browsers switch from quirks mode to standards mode — the layout stops drifting between them.
- Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.20.2.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Meta Pixel with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.