Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for valstudio.by

5 pages crawled — 4380 words, 66 images and 115 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 58 distinct problems found, counted 132 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
83/100
SEO
48/100 · Issues: 41
Accessibility
78/100 · Issues: 18
Performance
91/100 · Issues: 7
Security
36/100 · Issues: 33
Privacy
95/100 · Issues: 4
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
87/100 · Issues: 3
Console
91/100 · Issues: 5
Infrastructure
84/100 · Issues: 5
Mobile
89/100 · Issues: 8
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.valstudio.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 2 of 4 checked.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.