Scan report for tv-help.by
4 pages crawled — 5713 words, 43 images and 367 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 40 distinct problems found, counted 79 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-02
Category scores
- Overall
- 85/100
- SEO
- 76/100 · Issues: 8
- Accessibility
- 66/100 · Issues: 16
- Performance
- 79/100 · Issues: 14
- Security
- 43/100 · Issues: 29
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 91/100 · Issues: 4
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 81/100 · Issues: 3
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- High — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 5 of 10 checked.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.