Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for tut-eda.by

5 pages crawled — 3377 words, 585 images and 1014 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 47 distinct problems found, counted 158 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
84/100
SEO
82/100 · Issues: 18
Accessibility
65/100 · Issues: 32
Performance
66/100 · Issues: 34
Security
40/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
88/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
87/100 · Issues: 7
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
93/100 · Issues: 7
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 11 of 11 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.