Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for termopol.org

5 pages crawled — 2954 words, 57 images and 108 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 41 distinct problems found, counted 99 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
87/100
SEO
71/100 · Issues: 31
Accessibility
93/100 · Issues: 10
Performance
92/100 · Issues: 9
Security
6/100 · Issues: 31
Privacy
86/100 · Issues: 6
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
92/100 · Issues: 9
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Preconnect to the origins the page loads assets from — The DNS, TCP and TLS work for the other origins happens while the HTML is still parsing.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1, x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.