Scan report for sukno.by
1 pages crawled — 505 words, 32 images and 65 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 44 distinct problems found, counted 44 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-30
Category scores
- Overall
- 82/100
- SEO
- 61/100 · Issues: 9
- Accessibility
- 70/100 · Issues: 6
- Performance
- 76/100 · Issues: 8
- Security
- 34/100 · Issues: 12
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- Links
- 82/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Medium — SEO — 2 hreflang alternates redirect or do not answer: / → /ru/ (ru-ru), / → /en/ (en-gb).
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- High — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 10 of 10 checked.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.