Scan report for seoli.by
5 pages crawled — 21603 words, 665 images and 531 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 45 distinct problems found, counted 194 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-28
Category scores
- Overall
- 79/100
- SEO
- 84/100 · Issues: 14
- Accessibility
- 74/100 · Issues: 28
- Performance
- 80/100 · Issues: 26
- Security
- 34/100 · Issues: 40
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 85/100 · Issues: 15
- Forms
- 31/100 · Issues: 45
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 82/100 · Issues: 10
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 91/100 · Issues: 5
- Images
- 88/100 · Issues: 10
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Low — SEO — Internal links that differ from the address the server serves only by a trailing slash, and are redirected on every visit: 2.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.