Scan report for saint-tropez.by
1 pages crawled — 759 words, 90 images and 12 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 40 distinct problems found, counted 41 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 77/100
- SEO
- 58/100 · Issues: 8
- Accessibility
- 25/100 · Issues: 7
- Performance
- 76/100 · Issues: 4
- Security
- 0/100 · Issues: 13
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 91/100 · Issues: 3
- Mobile
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
- Stop echoing the Origin while allowing credentials — Other sites can no longer read this one with a visitor’s session attached.
- Toggle aria-expanded on the menu button — Screen readers announce whether the menu is open or closed.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Compress scripts and stylesheets — Scripts and stylesheets transfer at a fraction of their size.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Critical — Security — The site echoes the requesting origin and allows credentials — any page a signed-in visitor opens can read it with their session cookie.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Medium — Performance — 16 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 8 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.