Scan report for rusavtoprom.by
4 pages crawled — 1401 words, 40 images and 215 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 40 distinct problems found, counted 86 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 87/100
- SEO
- 72/100 · Issues: 19
- Accessibility
- 87/100 · Issues: 14
- Performance
- 78/100 · Issues: 13
- Security
- 43/100 · Issues: 29
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 82/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 89/100 · Issues: 5
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Add a twitter:card meta tag — Links shared on X get a preview card instead of a bare URL.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 3 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- High — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 10 of 10 checked.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.