Scan report for ruelta.ru
1 pages crawled — 616 words, 19 images and 54 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 40 distinct problems found, counted 40 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 80/100
- SEO
- 52/100 · Issues: 8
- Accessibility
- 55/100 · Issues: 7
- Performance
- 70/100 · Issues: 4
- Security
- 10/100 · Issues: 14
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
- Redirect http:// to https:// — Visitors and crawlers land on the encrypted address every time.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Compress scripts and stylesheets — Scripts and stylesheets transfer at a fraction of their size.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
What the site checks found
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Medium — SEO — Both ruelta.ru and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — The Content-Security-Policy sets no default-src, object-src, base-uri, frame-ancestors, so those are left at the browser default.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 9 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.