Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for rozmarin.by

5 pages crawled — 4576 words, 155 images and 913 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 57 distinct problems found, counted 223 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-31

Category scores

Overall
73/100
SEO
86/100 · Issues: 21
Accessibility
37/100 · Issues: 47
Performance
75/100 · Issues: 19
Security
37/100 · Issues: 30
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
79/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
0/100 · Issues: 62
Links
94/100 · Issues: 10
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
93/100 · Issues: 7
Images
88/100 · Issues: 10

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Submit the password form over POST — The password stops appearing in URLs, server logs and browser history.
  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /upload/iblock/80b/s0prk9lfpi7it9lsnwyoc3lpvpp6peyr.jpg (652 KB).
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Ads, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.