Scan report for rityal.by
4 pages crawled — 4342 words, 52 images and 882 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 71 distinct problems found, counted 150 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 78/100
- SEO
- 87/100 · Issues: 16
- Accessibility
- 44/100 · Issues: 29
- Performance
- 60/100 · Issues: 20
- Security
- 0/100 · Issues: 41
- Privacy
- 95/100 · Issues: 4
- HTML validity
- 90/100 · Issues: 8
- Forms
- 95/100 · Issues: 5
- Links
- 95/100 · Issues: 7
- Console
- 89/100 · Issues: 5
- Infrastructure
- 89/100 · Issues: 3
- Mobile
- 90/100 · Issues: 9
- Images
- 98/100 · Issues: 3
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Turn on gzip or brotli compression for HTML — HTML transfers shrink by roughly 70%, cutting load time on every visit.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — Strict-Transport-Security is set but its max-age is under six months.
- Critical — Security — Files a deploy should never publish are readable over the web: /.git/config, /.git/HEAD.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.28.0, x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 9 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.