Scan report for rekrutslavgorod.ru
5 pages crawled — 0 words, 0 images and 0 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 42 distinct problems found, counted 114 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-03
Category scores
- Overall
- 85/100
- SEO
- 30/100 · Issues: 47
- Accessibility
- 77/100 · Issues: 8
- Performance
- 87/100 · Issues: 3
- Security
- 64/100 · Issues: 24
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 94/100 · Issues: 10
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 91/100 · Issues: 5
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Mobile
- 89/100 · Issues: 10
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Replace the legacy doctype with <!DOCTYPE html> — The page renders in standards mode in every browser.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 1 of 5 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.rekrutslavgorod.ru and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Medium — SEO — Sitemap URLs answering with an error: 1 of 5 checked — the sitemap is sending crawlers at pages that are gone.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 8 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.