Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for r-s.by

2 pages crawled — 735 words, 14 images and 38 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 33 distinct problems found, counted 49 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-01

Category scores

Overall
87/100
SEO
39/100 · Issues: 15
Accessibility
87/100 · Issues: 5
Performance
75/100 · Issues: 11
Security
58/100 · Issues: 12
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
100/100 · No issues found
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 2
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
97/100 · Issues: 2
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Stop robots.txt from disallowing the whole site — Search engines are allowed to read the site at all.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Toggle aria-expanded on the menu button — Screen readers announce whether the menu is open or closed.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.

What the site checks found

  • Critical — SEO — robots.txt disallows crawling of the home page — search engines are shut out of the site.
  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Ads with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.