Scan report for protext.by
1 pages crawled — 2630 words, 19 images and 43 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 41 distinct problems found, counted 41 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-28
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 76/100 · Issues: 6
- Accessibility
- 22/100 · Issues: 9
- Performance
- 76/100 · Issues: 8
- Security
- 40/100 · Issues: 12
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Forms
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 82/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Toggle aria-expanded on the menu button — Screen readers announce whether the menu is open or closed.
- Show a visible focus indicator — Keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
- Confirm the noindex pages are meant to be hidden — Pages meant to be found come back into search; the ones kept out stay out on purpose.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.