Scan report for polyclinic.by
1 pages crawled — 7 words, 0 images and 0 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 31 distinct problems found, counted 31 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 86/100
- SEO
- 28/100 · Issues: 12
- Accessibility
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Performance
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Security
- 43/100 · Issues: 11
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 91/100 · Issues: 3
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.polyclinic.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.