Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for piligrym.by

5 pages crawled — 6018 words, 64 images and 150 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 54 distinct problems found, counted 121 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-31

Category scores

Overall
81/100
SEO
74/100 · Issues: 17
Accessibility
82/100 · Issues: 13
Performance
88/100 · Issues: 12
Security
0/100 · Issues: 37
Privacy
86/100 · Issues: 5
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 4
Forms
77/100 · Issues: 6
Links
98/100 · Issues: 1
Console
95/100 · Issues: 3
Infrastructure
88/100 · Issues: 11
Mobile
90/100 · Issues: 9
Images
98/100 · Issues: 3

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Give every page a <title> — The page gets a real headline in results and browser tabs.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.

What the site checks found

  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Medium — Security — The WordPress REST route /wp-json/wp/v2/users answers to anyone, listing the login name of every author on the site.
  • Low — Security — /readme.html is published and names the WordPress version (2.7).
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/5.6.40.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.